Optimization in the Oil and Gas Industry: A Review of Techniques, Trends, and Scientific Advances

Authors

  • Efe Akpotu Academy of Engineering, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation Author
  • Justice Obomejero Institute of Environmental Engineering, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation Author
  • Opelopejesu Israel Adeyanju Institute of Environmental Engineering, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation Author
  • Ogheneochuko Shadrack Efeni Institute of Environmental Engineering, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation Author
  • Emudiaga Fortune Ahwinahwi Department of Business and Finance, University of East London, London, United Kingdom Author
  • Franklin Endurance Igbigbi College of Science, Federal University of Petroleum Resources, Effurun, Delta State, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63623/j5jybk62

Keywords:

Digitalization, Energy efficiency, Optimization, Process control, Sustainability

Abstract

The oil and gas industry is undergoing a transformative shift driven by the pursuit of operational efficiency, environmental responsibility, and technological innovation. This review critically analyzes optimization strategies deployed across upstream, midstream, and downstream operations. Drawing from recent advances, it explores the integration of feedback control systems, machine learning algorithms, and digitalization tools such as digital twins and edge computing. The review highlights how traditional PID-based control logic has evolved to support real-time optimization, while artificial neural networks (ANNs) have emerged as effective alternatives to physics-based models, particularly in artificial lift and reservoir management. A key finding is the centrality of robust data governance in ensuring the reliability and sustainability of optimization outcomes. Quantitative studies confirm that digital investment, when aligned with organizational restructuring, significantly enhances energy efficiency and production performance. The review also identifies persistent barriers, including corporate resistance to automation and technical misalignment between optimization layers. Emerging trends such as hybrid energy systems and multidimensional optimization frameworks reflect the industry’s growing alignment with environmental and social sustainability goals. This synthesis provides practical insights and a forward-looking perspective on the tools and strategies delivering measurable value in oil and gas optimization under real-world constraints.

References

[1]IEA P. World energy outlook 2022. Paris, France: International Energy Agency (IEA). 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022 (accessed on 14 August 2025)

[2]Statistical Review of World Energy 2023. BP p.l.c. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html (accessed on 14 August 2025)

[3]Bongers A. Energy efficiency, emission energy, and the environment. Energy Research Letters, 2020, 1(2), 13186. DOI: 10.46557/001c.13186

[4]Barzegar M, Rashidinejad M, Abdollahi A, Afzali P, Bakhshai A. An efficient reliability index for the assessment of energy efficiency considering sitting of green virtual resources in a microgrid. Energy, 2020, 191, 116606. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116606

[5]Krishnamoorthy D, Fjalestad K, Skogestad S. Optimal operation of oil and gas production using simple feedback control structures. Control Engineering Practice, 2019, 91, 104107. DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.104107

[6]Shinkevich AI, Kostyukhin YY, Savon DY, Safronov AE, Aleksakhin AV. Optimization of energy-efficient functioning of the oil and gas sector of the economy through digitalization and resource conservation. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2021, 11(5), 321-330. DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.11695

[7]Darby ML, Nikolaou M, Jones J, Nicholson D. RTO: An overview and assessment of current practice. Journal of Process Control, 2011, 21(6), 874-884. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.03.009

[8]Foss B, Knudsen BR, Grimstad B. Petroleum production optimization–a static or dynamic problem?. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2018, 114, 245-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.10.009

[9]Campos MC, Teixeira H, Liporace F, Gomes M. Challenges and problems with advanced control and optimization technologies. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2009, 42(11), 1-8. DOI: 10.3182/20090712-4-TR-2008.00003

[10]Munyai TT. Optimization of oil and gas production life cycle through data management. Master’s thesis, University of Johannesburg, South Africa, 2017. https://hdl.handle.net/10210/493120 (accessed on 14 August 2025)

[11]Skogestad S. Plantwide control: The search for the self-optimizing control structure. Journal of Process Control, 2000, 10(5), 487-507. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-1524(00)00023-8

[12]Morari M, Arkun Y, Stephanopoulos G. Studies in the synthesis of control structures for chemical processes: Part I: Formulation of the problem. Process decomposition and the classification of the control tasks. Analysis of the optimizing control structures. AIChE Journal, 1980, 26(2), 220-232. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690260205

[13]Halvorsen IJ, Skogestad S, Morud JC, Alstad V. Optimal selection of controlled variables. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2003, 42(14), 3273-3284. DOI: 10.1021/ie020833t

[14]Arksey H, O'malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2005, 8(1), 19-32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616

[15]Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 104, 333-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

[16]Krishnamoorthy D, Skogestad S. Online process optimization with active constraint set changes using simple control structures. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(30), 13555-13567. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00308

[17]Pavlov A, Krishnamoorthy D, Fjalestad K, Aske E, Fredriksen M. Modelling and model predictive control of oil wells with electric submersible pumps. 2014 IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA), 2014, 586–592. DOI: 10.1109/CCA.2014.6981403

[18]Sharma R, Glemmestad B. On generalized reduced gradient method with multi-start and self-optimizing control structure for gas lift allocation optimization. Journal of Process Control, 2013, 23(8), 1129-1140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.07.001

[19]Urbanczyk CH, Wattenbarger RA. Optimization of well rates under gas coning conditions. SPE Advanced Technology Series, 1994, 2(2), 61-68. DOI: 10.2118/21677-PA

[20]Takacs G. Electrical submersible pumps manual: Design, operations, and maintenance. Gulf Professional Publishing, An Imprint of Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-85617-557-9.X0001-2

[21]Reyes-Lúa A, Zotică C, Das T, Krishnamoorthy D, Skogestad S. Changing between active constraint regions for optimal operation: Classical advanced control versus model predictive control. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 2018, 43, 1015-1020. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64235-6.50178-9

[22]Zhang L. Big Data Analytics for eMaintenance: Modeling of high-dimensional data streams, Licentiate thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1740800/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed on 14 August 2025)

[23]Onomuakpose PI, Mgbemena CO, Anaidhuno ED, Anaidhuno UP. Gas lift optimization of an oil well using artificial neural networks (ANN). International Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 2025, 3(3), 1-3.

[24]Binder BJ, Kufoalor DK, Pavlov A, Johansen TA. Embedded model predictive control for an electric submersible pump on a programmable logic controller. In 2014 IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA), 2014, 579–585. DOI: 10.1109/CCA.2014.6981402

[25]Elgibaly AA, Ghareeb M, Kamel S, El-Bassiouny ME. Prediction of gas-lift performance using neural network analysis. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(2), 355–378. DOI: 10.3934/energy.2021019

[26]Gomaa S, Soliman AA, Nasr K, Emara R, El-Hoshoudy AN, Attia AM. Development of artificial neural network models to calculate the areal sweep efficiency for direct line, staggered line drive, five-spot, and nine-spot injection patterns. Fuel, 2022, 317, 123564. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123564

[27]Gouda A, Gomaa S, Attia A, Emara R, Desouky SM, El-Hoshoudy AN. Development of an artificial neural network model for predicting the dew point pressure of retrograde gas condensate. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 208, 109284. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109284

[28]Ren S, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Sakao T, Huisingh D, Almeida CM. A comprehensive review of big data analytics throughout product lifecycle to support sustainable smart manufacturing: A framework, challenges and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 210 1343-1365. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.025

[29]Davidson JE, Beckner BL. Integrated optimization for rate allocation in reservoir simulation. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2003, 6(6), 426-432. DOI: 10.2118/87309-PA

[30]Kruk M, Shabalina A. Optimization of the investment portfolio for oil and gas projects under conditions of risk and uncertainty. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 2025, 9, 10928. DOI: 10.24294/jipd10928

[31]Okorocha IT, Chinwuko CE, Mgbemena CO, Godfrey OC, Mgbemena CE. Production optimization using gas lift incorporated with artificial neural network. UNIZIK Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2022, 21(1), 842-858.

[32]Okorocha IT, Chinwuko CE, Mgbemena CE, Mgbemena CO. Gas lift optimization in the oil and gas production process: A review of production challenges and optimization strategies. International Journal of Industrial Optimization, 2020, 1(2), 61. DOI:10.12928/ijio.v1i2.2470

[33]McCarthy D. IoT and digitalization of petroleum and gas production. Pipeline and Gas Journal, 2018, 245(2), 49-51. Available at: https://pgjonline.com/magazine/2018/february-2018-vol-245-no-2/features/iot-and-digitalization-of-oil-and-gas-production (accessed on 14 August 2025)

[34]Wang P. Development and applications of production optimization techniques for petroleum fields, Stanford University, USA, 2003. https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/pdf/pereports/PhD/Wang03.pdf (accessed on 14 August 2025)

[35]Kosmidis VD, Perkins JD, Pistikopoulos EN. Optimization of well oil rate allocations in petroleum fields. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(14), 3513-3527. DOI: 10.1021/ie034171z

[36]Wassink C, Grenier M, Roy O, Pearson N. Deployment of digital NDT solutions in the oil and gas industry. Materials Evaluation, 2020, 78(7), 861-868. DOI:10.32548/2020.me-04138

[37]Hause M, Ashfield S. The Oil and Gas Digital Engineering Journey. InINCOSE International Symposium, 2018, 28(1), 337-351. DOI: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2018.00485.x

[38]Forbes MG, Patwardhan RS, Hamadah H, Gopaluni RB. Model predictive control in industry: Challenges and opportunities. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2015, 48(8), 531-538. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.022

[39]Gerasimova KE, Naumova OA. Portfolio optimization technique of oil and gas company assets. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics, 2020, 3(185), 46-55. DOI: 10.46554/1993-0453-2020-3-185-46-55

[40]Ferriani F, Veronese G. Hedging and investment trade-offs in the US oil industry. Energy Economics, 2022, 106, 105736. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105736

[41]Ray T, Sarker R. Multiobjective evolutionary approach to the solution of gas lift optimization problems. In 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, 3182-3188. DOI: 10.1109/CEC.2006.1688712

[42]Rashid K. Optimal allocation procedure for gas-lift optimization. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(5), 2286-2294. DOI: 10.1021/ie900867r

[43]Begishev I, Khisamova Z, Vasyukov V. Technological, ethical, environmental and legal aspects of robotics. In E3S Web of Conferences, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2021, 244, 12028. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202124412028

[44]Gargallo P, Lample L, Miguel JA, Salvador M. Dynamic risk management in European energy portfolios: Evolution of the role of clean and carbon markets. Energy Reports, 2022, 8, 15654-15668. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.146

[45]Gupta N, Park H, Phaal R. The portfolio planning, implementing, and governing process: An inductive approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 180, 121652. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121652

[46]Faria VA, de Queiroz AR, DeCarolis JF. Scenario generation and risk-averse stochastic portfolio optimization applied to offshore renewable energy technologies. Energy, 2023, 270, 126946. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126946

[47]Ellis SC, Oh J, Henke JW, Suresh NC. Supplier relationship portfolio management: a social exchange perspective. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2023, 29(1), 100816. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2022.100816

[48]Fattahi S, Nafisi-Moghadam M. Do oil sanctions affect the interdependence and integration of financial markets?. Heliyon, 2023, 9(2), e13793. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13793

[49]Dmitrievsky AN, Eremin NA, Stolyarov VE. On the issue of the application of wireless decisions and technologies in the digital oil and gas production. Actual Problems of Oil and Gas, 2019, 2(25). DOI: 10.29222/ipng.2078-5712.2019-25.art11

[50]Qin SJ, Badgwell TA. A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Engineering Practice, 2003, 11(7), 733-764. DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0661(02)00186-7

[51]Mayne DQ. Robust and stochastic mpc: Are we going in the right direction?. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2015, 48(23), 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.11.255

[52]Harjoto MA, Hoepner AG, Li Q. Corporate social irresponsibility and portfolio performance: A cross-national study. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2021, 70, 101274. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101274

[53]Gupta V, Grossmann IE. Offshore oilfield development planning under uncertainty and fiscal considerations. Optimization and Engineering, 2017, 18(1), 3-33. DOI: 10.1007/s11081-016-9331-4

[54]Merino J, Caballero I, Rivas B, Serrano M, Piattini M. A data quality in use model for big data. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2016, 63, 123-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2015.11.024

[55]Perrons RK, Jensen JW. Data as an asset: What the oil and gas sector can learn from other industries about “Big Data”. Energy Policy, 2015, 81, 117-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.020

[56]Global Energy Perspective 2023: Oil Outlook. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/global-energy-perspective-2023 (accessed on 14 August 2025)

[57]Digital Transformation at Scale: ADNOC’s Panorama Command Center. Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, 2023. https://www.adnoc.ae/en/news-and-media/press-releases/2020/adnoc-panorama-digital-command-center-generates-over-1-billion-in-value/ (accessed on 14 August 2025).

[58]Anaba DC, Kess-Momoh AJ, Ayodeji SA. Digital transformation in oil and gas production: Enhancing efficiency and reducing costs. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 2024, 6(7), 2153-2161. DOI: 10.51594/ijmer.v6i7.1263

[59]Ahmad T, Alexander D. The Impact of Data Integrity on Clinical Trial Outcomes: Insights from Machine Learning. ResearchGate, 2023. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373214558_The_Impact_of_Data_Integrity_on_Clinical_Trial_Outcomes_Insights_from_Machine_Learning (accessed on 14 August 2025).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-03

Issue

Section

Articles